top of page

Telangana/Andhra Pradesh Case Laws
A dedicated archive of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh matrimonial case laws, with emphasis on cruelty, psychological abuse, unreasonable behaviour, and traits often associated with narcissistic partners. Designed to provide authoritative legal insight for readers seeking clarity on divorce and protection from emotionally abusive relationships.


How to Prove Mental Cruelty in Divorce: Telangana High Court Ruling Explained
Mental cruelty in divorce cases is often difficult to prove due to the absence of physical evidence. This post analyses a Telangana High Court decision where authenticated, certified documentary evidence played a decisive role in establishing cruelty under matrimonial law.


Telangana High Court Quashes Dowry and Domestic Violence Case Filed by Father-in-Law, Pursued Despite U.S. Divorce and Settlement
The Telangana High Court quashed a dowry and domestic violence case filed by a father-in-law against his U.S.-based son-in-law, holding that the prosecution—though initiated prior to the foreign divorce—was pursued despite the divorce and settlement, and suffered from hearsay evidence and fatal jurisdictional defects under Section 188 CrPC.


Maintenance Reduced from ₹90K to ₹50K: Wife's ₹3.5 Crore Debt and Ongoing Loan-Default Proceedings Prompt Telangana HC to Clarify That Maintenance Isn’t for Business Loans
The Telangana High Court reduced a wife’s maintenance from ₹90,000 to ₹50,000 per month, holding that Section 125 CrPC read with Rajnesh v. Neha secures dignified survival, not repayment of ₹3.5 crore business or personal debts. This post analyses the Court’s reasoning and its limits on maintenance law.


Supreme Court Quashes 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Proceedings Against In-Laws for Vague and Omnibus Allegations
The Supreme Court reaffirmed that criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act cannot be sustained against in-laws on the basis of vague and omnibus allegations lacking specific instances or particulars, and quashed the case against the mother-in-law and father-in-law.


Can Indian Courts Restrain Divorce Proceedings in Foreign Courts? Anti-Suit Injunction Explained
Explore how Indian courts grant anti-suit injunctions in matrimonial disputes involving foreign courts, explained through a Telangana High Court ruling.


Husband Sending Money to Family, Forcing Expense Tracking and Exercising Financial Dominance Does Not Amount to ‘Cruelty’ Under Section 498A IPC says Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC, holding that allegations of a husband sending money to his family, compelling expense tracking through Excel sheets, and exercising financial dominance though reflective of common social patterns do not amount to “cruelty” in the absence of tangible mental or physical harm.


No Alimony for Employed Wife; INR 80 Lakhs for the Minor Daughter; Telangana High Court Confirms Husband’s Divorce Petition on Grounds of Cruelty After Prolonged Litigation
After more than a decade of acrimonious matrimonial litigation marked by criminal complaints, arrests, and failed mediation, the Telangana High Court upheld a decree of divorce on grounds of cruelty. While denying maintenance and permanent alimony to an employed wife, the Court significantly enhanced the minor daughter’s settlement from ₹10 lakhs to INR 80 lakhs - sending a clear message on prolonged litigation, cruelty, and parental responsibility.


45 Days of Marriage, 11 Years of Litigation: Telangana High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Irretrievable Breakdown to Husband
A 45-day marriage followed by 12 years of separation led the Telangana High Court to grant divorce, examining concealment of mental illness, non-consummation, and irretrievable breakdown of marriage.


Child Custody|Telangana High Court|Shujahat Hussain V. Sidra Hussain|Advocate-Mother Violates Visitation Order; High Court Issues Contempt Directions
The Telangana High Court addressed a serious violation of a visitation order after an advocate-mother relocated three minor children to Bhopal without permission. Holding the act to be wilful disobedience, the Court directed the immediate return of the children so the mother could first purge the contempt before defending her actions.
bottom of page

